<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>LangGraph on Navaneeth P T</title>
    <link>https://navaneethpt.tech/tags/langgraph/</link>
    <description>Recent content in LangGraph on Navaneeth P T</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.155.1</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://navaneethpt.tech/tags/langgraph/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Conventional RAG vs. Agentic RAG: When Retrieval Becomes Research</title>
      <link>https://navaneethpt.tech/posts/conventional-vs-agentic-rag/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://navaneethpt.tech/posts/conventional-vs-agentic-rag/</guid>
      <description>Two document-chat prototypes show where a single retrieval pass works, how bounded agentic research works, and when its extra latency and complexity are justified.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
